No Coercion Exploring the idea of a stateless society.

21Dec/081

Keynesianism and government intervention

Here's a video of Dan Mitchell of the Cato Institute doing a pretty good job of explaining why Keynesian economics is absurd: Keynesian Economics is Wrong: Bigger Gov't is Not Stimulus

And here's a good piece from a more hardcore libertarian (Austrian) perspective: "Neanderthal" Economics.

From the piece:

However, there is something government can do in the Austrian cure for a recession: radically remove itself from the economy. It can cut spending and taxes, which will encourage saving and investment. It can allow businesses and banks to fail. It could abolish the central bank. It can allow prices to fall. A removal of regulations that hamper the free market will also aid the market in recovery. As Murray Rothbard wrote,

"In sum, the proper governmental policy in a depression is strict laissez-faire, including stringent budget slashing, and coupled perhaps with positive encouragement for credit contraction. For decades such a program has been labelled 'ignorant,' 'reactionary,' or 'Neanderthal' by conventional economists. On the contrary, it is the policy clearly dictated by economic science to those who wish to end the depression as quickly and as cleanly as possible."

Krugman, assuming he really wants to cure the recession, would be wise to leave Bizarro World, and to follow Neanderthal economics.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Filed under: Uncategorized Leave a comment
Comments (1) Trackbacks (0)
  1. Welcome back.

    I don’t really see how allowing major money center banks to fall “cures” the recession. A huge contraction in the money supply resulting from large bank failures (WaMu, Citi, Wachovia) would inevitably result in unemployment north of 20% and huge INTERNATIONAL political chaos.

    Congratulations on the new addition BTW.


Leave a comment

(required)

No trackbacks yet.